EMI, Matt & their Release Quality.
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 3:35 pm
Hi Richard
I'll start by saying that most recocrd companies especially the major's are a disgrace, they put out shoddy product at inflated prices, with more often than not terrible mastering that is too loud, compressed & with excessive noise reduction, this is long held view of mine.
On reading about the making of the "Singles Collection", along with comments from Michelle regarding the upcoming "The Greatest" CD, you both mentioned EMI's practice of using needle drops from existing albums on their EMI releases in the past, with Michelle inferring if it had been up to them (EMI) the new "Greatest" compilation would have been compiled this way. Needle drops should only ever be used as a last resort if no masters exist in the vaults, so this is really sickening to hear that it seems to be standard practice from EMI.
From your comments to me in the "Singles Collection" thread, it appears to me that you remaster with care only tinkering where needed unlike many modern day remasters, you also go back to the original master tapes and really seem to care about doing the best for Matt's legacy & giving us the fan's the best possible quality.
So my question is, How hard is it for Michelle & yourself to achieve this end, is it a constant battle with EMI against their shoddy practices and disregard of an artists catalogue, it is as you state in your singles collection comments, well known that EMI's vaults are well looked after and catalogued, so why do they insist on putting out needle drops, this practice really horrifies me and makes my opinion of Record companies already at an all time low go down even further.
I'll start by saying that most recocrd companies especially the major's are a disgrace, they put out shoddy product at inflated prices, with more often than not terrible mastering that is too loud, compressed & with excessive noise reduction, this is long held view of mine.
On reading about the making of the "Singles Collection", along with comments from Michelle regarding the upcoming "The Greatest" CD, you both mentioned EMI's practice of using needle drops from existing albums on their EMI releases in the past, with Michelle inferring if it had been up to them (EMI) the new "Greatest" compilation would have been compiled this way. Needle drops should only ever be used as a last resort if no masters exist in the vaults, so this is really sickening to hear that it seems to be standard practice from EMI.
From your comments to me in the "Singles Collection" thread, it appears to me that you remaster with care only tinkering where needed unlike many modern day remasters, you also go back to the original master tapes and really seem to care about doing the best for Matt's legacy & giving us the fan's the best possible quality.
So my question is, How hard is it for Michelle & yourself to achieve this end, is it a constant battle with EMI against their shoddy practices and disregard of an artists catalogue, it is as you state in your singles collection comments, well known that EMI's vaults are well looked after and catalogued, so why do they insist on putting out needle drops, this practice really horrifies me and makes my opinion of Record companies already at an all time low go down even further.